Exclusive interview with Russ Foxx by Iva Kanceska 09/11/2009
Q: When did you actually start doing this?
A: I started body piercing around the year 2000, and over time have
taken up many different forms of body art. I have been practicing
body suspensions since 2003.
Q: What would you say to people who look at this very
skeptically?
A: All individuals are entitled to their own opinions and freedom of
speech as far as I’m concerned. If a person chooses to modify their
body or practice suspensions, this should not be hurting anyone else
or infringing upon anyone else’s freedoms. To each; their own.
Q: What is the difference between tattooing and branding?
A: Tattooing and branding are two completely different forms of body
art. Tattooing deals with needles repeatedly pushing ink and/or
pigments into the dermis which can create all sorts of colorful
artistic outcomes. Branding is a form of artistic scarification,
most commonly practiced by strike or electro-cautery methods. This
art form either burns or vaporizes the dermis to create an
artistically planned scar.
\

Q: Which part of the body is most dangerous for branding?
A: Caution should be taken when branding any part of the body, as
careless work has the potential to cause damage to muscle tissue
and/or any number of other vital organs below the dermis.
Q: Does every one of your mods tell its own story, or are
there some that are purely decorative?
A: Some of my modifications are functional, but some simply serve
aesthetic purposes. For example, my split tongue and apadravya
piercing both serve sexual functions as well as aesthetics. My
magnet implant simply serves a function. This implant has created a
new sense of “magnetic vision” as a 6th sense I was not born with.
My subdermal horn implants serve the function of promoting and
representing my art as well as having aesthetic value. Many of my
tattoos also represent different changes in and aspects of my life.


Q: Is there any special aftercare when it comes to tongue
splits?
A: A fresh tongue split is an oral wound, so basically the same
diligent care should be taken as with a fresh tongue piercing.
Q: Which is more painful: scarification or tattooing?
A: Different people have different thresholds of how much pain that
they can endure and how long they can endure it for. I have
personally found that branding hurt me more than cutting did, and
cutting was fairly close to tattooing in sensation. There were
differences in sensation between tattooing and cutting, but overall
the pain threshold was the same for me. I believe heavily in mind
over matter and feel that if a person wants to achieve something
badly enough, they will find the ability to endure exceptional
amounts of pain to get to their desired destination.


Q: Are there any anesthetic allowed to use?
A: Some artists use various types of topical anesthetics prior to a
number of different procedures including tattooing, scarification
and body piercing. I personally do not use anesthetics with any of
my body art. I feel that pain is a part of the experience that
should be respected.
Q: What is the risk of HIV infection by scarification?
A: When scarification or any other form of body art is practiced in
health board approved facilities by knowledgeable practitioners with
blood-borne pathogens and infectious disease training, the risk of
being infected by HIV or any other benchmark infectious disease is
slim to none. My home studio (www.thefalltattooing.com) takes every
precaution in guaranteeing our clients’ as well as our artists’
safety and personal well being at all times. Due to the fact that
scarification is often larger wounds, diligent care must be taken
with aftercare to be proactive in avoiding any infections after
leaving the studio the work was done in.
Q: Do you think it is necessary to have any medical
background to perform this procedure?
A: I feel that although a medical background would indeed be
beneficial to a scarification artist, ethical boundaries that apply
to medical licensing would hinder their ability to perform such art
forms. We have a double-edged sword scenario here in North America.
Q: What do you think about the claim that body modification
is a right, and that employers should not be allowed to discriminate
on it, be it for freedom of expression rights (as BME generally
defends) or for freedom of religion rights (as the Church of Body
Modification generally makes noise about)?
A: I feel that if practiced for spiritual reasons, body modification
should definitely be considered a religious right. In my opinion,
body modification should always be considered a constitutional right
when practiced for positive reasons and/or outcomes. In my eyes,
this is what differentiates body “modification” from “mutilation”.
In regards to employment vs. body modification, I feel that
employers should not have any right to discriminate against body
modifications as long as said modifications do not pose a valid
safety concern to the company itself, its employees or its
clientele. I feel that if a company can prove that its employees’
body modifications directly cause the company to lose revenue, then
body modification can be a valid discrepancy to employment in that
case.


Q: In the past, people would keep most of their
modifications private, and not start messing with public skin until
they were retired. Nowadays, young people tend to start their sleeve
tattoos at the wrist and work up, and pierce their faces long before
piercing their genitals. Why do you think this change happened, and
what do you think of it?
A: I see body modification slowly becoming more and more accepted in
today’s society. Certain body modification trends are becoming
socially accepted that were considered taboo in the past. I feel
that this is great for our Western culture which has long forgotten
its historic body modification practices and sense of healthy self
expression.
Q: Obviously you guys travel to other conventions and body
mod-related events around the world. How do you feel this has
affected your own practices, and do you consider it reciprocal, do
you find you get to influence other suspension groups’ practices?
A: I feel that traveling is a necessity for a progressive artist. As
an avid traveler, I feel that different cultures and countries of
the world always inspire the furthering of my art. I take any
opportunity I can to share my insight and experience to other
artists around the world.
Q: How do you think the body modification world will evolve?
What are the major tendencies coming up?
A: In the future I hope to see the body modification world continue
to share information with one another and grow under healthy and
positive light. I hope to see artists stand united in order to
increase our strength against government invasions and violations of
our industry and artistic practices. I hope to keep seeing our
society’s skewed views of body modification and spiritual practices
being fought and overpowered.
Thank you for the interview Iva. http://russfoxx.com
You are welcome!




